Chapter 60 Isn’t this just a primary school student standing on the side?

[Player No. 12 please speak]

"Isn't this an elementary school student standing by? Without even a second thought, he must think 4 is the prophet."

"Don't tell me there were many wolves after the police were called. The gargoyle happened to verify that he was a prophet on the first night. It happened to be this order of speaking, so he accepted the check and kill."

"I do not believe!"

"Player 3, your logic is correct. I must admit that. The situations you mentioned are indeed possible. I admit that as well."

"But I'm sorry, I'm probably a little different from other players. I don't like deep, complex logic, low-probability events, or anti-logic."

"I only consider the correct logic and the high probability situations."

"Because most of the time, wolves like to go against the mentality of good people, and like to use those low-probability events to trick good people into taking advantage of loopholes."

"But as long as I am firm, don't speculate on low-probability events, and don't use counter-logic, the wolf can't fool me even if he talks too much."

Player 12 is a very interesting person.

It can be heard that he is rather stubborn and sticks to his own opinions, so he doesn't pay any attention to Gu Feng's arguments and logic.

Of course.

It’s not that Player No. 12 didn’t understand, but he didn’t want to play in that direction.

He admitted that the gargoyles that Gu Feng had spotted and the wolves that were behind the police were all situations that theoretically existed and were possible.

But after all, it cannot change the fact that these are low-probability events.

As long as it is a low-probability event, he will selectively ignore it.

This is called responding to ever-changing situations with the same attitude.

No matter what level your logic is at, I'll be waiting for you at the first level.

If you lose, you lose. If you win, you win.

Practice proves.

When he started playing like this, his winning rate actually increased.

What Gu Feng fears most is meeting this kind of player, whose heart is as hard as a rock, and nothing you say can affect him.

On the contrary, those who are as smart as monkeys are easier to deceive.

"4 is the prophet. Player 3 jumped out of the spot after receiving the check. It could be the wolf cub, but it could also be the gargoyle."

"But generally speaking, when a Gargoyle receives a check kill, he won't jump from the spot, but will wait for his teammates in the outside position to rescue him."

"Player No. 3 dared to jump directly with Player No. 4 on the spot, which means he is most likely a little wolf."

"Of course, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if he's a little wolf or a gargoyle. Anyway, there's nothing wrong with sending him out today."

"3 said he checked and killed player 8. In this case, 3 and 8 can't be wolf teammates. Player 8 is a good guy."

"There must be a wolf among the police. The possibility of three people without a wolf is too small. And I just said that I don't deal with low-probability events."

"So, we need to find a wolf among 2 and 6. It's hard to say who it will be. Let's wait and see their vote patterns and listen to their speeches. Anyway, there's no rush."

Player No. 12 really doesn't bother with those roundabout things, and just goes straight to the point with correct logic.

Gu Feng is a wolf, and player No. 8 accepted Gu Feng’s attack, so player No. 8 is a good guy.

As for using wolves to gain an identity, can't he think of it?
No, he just didn't think about it on purpose. He was selectively blind.

When playing with this kind of person, his ideas and concepts may confuse others at the beginning.

But if you play a few more games with him and become familiar with his playing style and personality, it is actually very easy to grasp him.

But the game matching mechanism in this world is completely random.

This means that no one will be familiar with his playing style and habits. Therefore, it is indeed okay for player No. 12 to play like this.

His way of playing, which only follows positive logic and high-probability events, can be considered a different approach and not following the beaten path.

"Player 1 sounds like a good guy, because he is hostile to Player 3. He stands on my side, just like me. I can't beat him for now, so he is a wolf."

"As for Player 5, although she didn't discuss any logic, it's normal for her, as the first person to speak, not to discuss any logic. There's no logic to discuss without any information."

"But her speech was indeed very sincere. She said that the police came to evade the ticket, not hypocritical or pretentious. I still have a good impression of her. For the time being, I will treat her as a good person."

Player No. 12 recognized both 1 and 5.

There is nothing wrong with the logic, it's just too sloppy. And if it is so straightforward, there will be a problem: 1. What if wolves trample on each other?
Is this logic to bottom out or not?

He insisted on his own ideas and did not discuss, but the people in the external position did. How does he define the people who discuss?
[Player No. 11 please speak]

"When the 3rd and 4th players jump to the prophet, my police will definitely stand on the side of player 4. Although the logic of the 3rd game makes sense and seems to be true, no matter what, it is still a jump to the kill."

"I have a natural suspicion and distrust of the person who took over the investigation and killed him. I always feel that he is quibbling, fooling people, and making specious arguments."

"So, I decided to side with player No. 4 first, but I won't stand on the side to the death."

"Anyway, the logic of player 3 is pretty good, and he even talked about why he might have accepted the check, which is quite good."

"Player No. 4 is a gargoyle, or No. 4 is a little wolf fighting a prophet. These are all possible situations. The probability is definitely a little small, but we can't completely ignore it."

Player No. 11 stood up and expressed his attitude and position.

He wants to side with player No. 4, but not to the extreme, because he thinks Gu Feng's logic is still good and he has certain prophetic qualities.

It was Gu Feng's behavior of jumping out despite the investigation that made him have deep doubts.

If not for this, just listening to the speeches, it is certain that Gu Feng is better at chatting than Player No. 4.

After a pause, 11 said, "I think the player No. 12 in the front position is too stubborn. Looking at his posture, it is obvious that he is on the side of player No. 4 and will not look back."

"To be honest, even though his side is the same as mine and his play is indeed full of positive logic, I don't feel very good about his listening. On the contrary, it's a bit worse."

"I think if 4 is a prophet, it is possible that 12 will sell out his teammates and play a hook. If 4 is a wolf, it is possible that 4 and 12 are both wolves, and 12 will set the pace and charge."

"In a word, Player 12 has a lot of potential in my case. No matter who the prophet is, he could be the wolf."

Player No. 11 is quite hostile towards Player No. 12 because he thinks Player No. 12 is just talking nonsense.

If we don't consider anti-logic and low-probability events, then the good guys will be fooled by the wolves, right?

You know, here, the night werewolves can communicate with each other. With such a good opportunity, how can they not fight and discuss some tactics?

Since there are tactics and formats, they must involve anti-logic and low-probability events, and even details that the good guys would never think of.

According to the gameplay and thinking of 12, what can the good guys use to find the wolves?
So, on the surface, 12 seemed to be chatting very decently, but in fact, he did not have the mentality of a good person at all, at least that's what 11 thought.

"If 3 is really a wolf, why would he come all the way to check and kill player 8? I don't think it's without purpose. There must be a reason."

"The biggest possibility is that 3 and 8 are double wolves, and 3 deliberately stepped on his wolf teammates to create an identity. However, this method of creating an identity is too old-fashioned and there is no way it can fool good people."

"So, the possibility of 3 and 8 being double wolves is relatively small. I have the same opinion as player 1 on this point. 3 probably did this to go against the mentality of the good guys in order to improve his prophecy face."

"There is another possibility. 2 and 3 are both wolves. 3 is not good at defining the identity of his wolf teammate, so he threw a check to 8."

"No one in the previous position had thought of this, so what I said can be regarded as a new idea."

"There's no need to talk about player 5. She definitely can't be considered a wolf. The people in front of me said that she has done a good job. If I say the opposite, I'm asking for trouble."

"On the police, treat player 5 as a good guy first. On the police, see how player 5 stands on the side and whether the wolf pit she chose is correct."

"Okay, that's all I have to say. Stand by player No. 4. Players 1 and 5 should be good guys. Player 12 is more likely to be a bandit. Player No. 2 needs special attention. Players 3 and 8 are unlikely to be double wolves. That's it. We've passed."

(End of this chapter)

previouscatalognext