Page 362
The more detailed the worldview is, the clearer the explanation of the phenomenon, and the easier it is to integrate the objects into human history.
For example, in a worldview based on yin and yang, in the most basic worldview, it is just a general statement that yin and yang give birth to all things, but in an advanced worldview, the definition of yin and yang will be more detailed.
The earth revolves around the sun, electrons revolve around the nucleus, and all of this is explained clearly on the basis of yin and yang - this is a sufficiently detailed worldview.
Naturally, this is more integrated into human history than the theory that yin and yang simply gave birth to all things, and than the theory that does not use yin and yang to explain what atoms are.
To conclude human history does not mean that you have to explain to human history what Yin and Yang and the Five Elements are, or what the Three Give Birth to All Things are. It does not mean that you have to come up with a bunch of abstruse theories and then let human history play freely.
Instead, you need to point out that 'this phenomenon is XXXX' so that it can be concluded in human history.
Any god or Buddha who wants to integrate his or her theory into human history needs to cooperate with human history, rather than human history having to cooperate with them.
The depth of worldview is roughly equal to the precision of industrial machine tools in human history.
High-precision machine tools alone are of no use, but high-precision machine tools are the foundation of cutting-edge industries and are absolutely indispensable.
Greek mythology is at a disadvantage in this regard. Zeus is considered strong among three-digit figures, but after the spiritual power was integrated with human history, his attainments at the microscopic level are not even as good as those of ordinary three-digit figures.
Researchers in the pantheon, such as the goddess of agriculture Demeter, all focus on the microscopic field.
Most of the gods in the box garden are like this. They specialize in the macro world and can bring out various powerful benefits within the world view, and they have high combat effectiveness.
When both sides have enough combat experience, the three-digit spiritual points allocation method for those majoring in micro is 'basic spiritual points + skills', and the three-digit points allocation method for those majoring in macro is 'basic spiritual points + strength'.
Those who majored in microeconomics can theoretically use a little force to achieve a great effect, but in reality their fighting ability is not that good. Everyone's experience and talents are not much different. How can you, a 70-year-old comrade who is proficient in various means of using the opponent's force to counter attack, and proficient in various fighting techniques, compare with a strongman weighing more than 200 pounds?
Those who practice three-digit numbers in the microscopic field will be at a disadvantage in terms of combat power, but they can more easily discover the essence of the world and perceive the laws of the box garden and human history. It can be said that there are pros and cons.
Among the top three figures in Greece, Zeus’s path to the microscopic realm is almost impossible. Athena had some hope of taking the path to the microscopic realm, but the one who becomes the king of gods needs to have enough combat power.
Athena now pays equal attention to the micro and macro. In this mode, her direct combat power may not be as good as those gods who purely focus on the macro field and work miracles with great strength, but her advantage is that she will not be found to have shortcomings.
For an example of how great power can make miracles happen, you can refer to Sun Wukong. On his journey to obtain Buddhist scriptures, he was targeted by various monsters whose fighting power was inferior to his. He could stand still and be hit by the monsters but they always had strange abilities that made him run away.
There was no Journey to the West in the box garden. After the Seven Days War, Sun Wukong was kept in Lingshan. However, the description in the book Journey to the West does illustrate the phenomena that may occur if one focuses too much on the macro-level practice.
You have high defense, thick health bar, and strong attack.
The enemy will prick you with needles and smoke you with smoke. It is difficult to be fatal to you, but you will not feel good either.
If your fatal weakness is found, you are doomed.
Among the top three-digit figures, there are Zeus who specializes in the macro field, and Athena who pays equal attention to the macro and micro. These are not uncommon.
But there are not many top three-digit people who specialize in the microscopic field in the small garden.
Theoretically, it is easier to advance by studying the microscopic field, but the three-digit spiritual level limit of the box garden is fixed.
Others use a certain amount of spiritual power to build tools that can observe nanometer-level lengths. Can you use the same amount of spiritual power to build a tool that can observe at meter-level lengths?
How difficult is this?
The more in-depth the research is on the micro field, the more it tests the talent of the person involved. Scientific research requires funds, and research in the micro field also requires sufficient achievements to conduct experiments, but more important is the talent of the person involved.
In the microscopic field, the researcher's brain is more important than funding.
In the macro field, it is the opposite. The more you study the macro field, the more funding you need. The talent of the person involved is certainly indispensable, but in the macro field, research funding is more critical than the brains of the person involved.
In the box garden, Hermes remembered three people who were relatively famous for their microscopic achievements.
The most famous person in this microscopic field is Laozi. Before he reached the double-digit level, he also made several moves in the box garden.
I am not focused on the micro field, but I pay equal attention to both macro and micro. Two-digit figures basically pay equal attention to both macro and micro, which will not leave me with obvious weaknesses.
The problem is that Lao Tzu himself may feel that he pays equal attention to the macro and micro aspects, but in the eyes of other gods and Buddhas in the box garden, his attainments in the macro field are not strong, but his attainments in the micro field are difficult for outsiders to understand.
In the realm of three digits, in the realm of the microscopic, the number that impressed Hermes most was two... or maybe three.
Gaia, one of the Greek gods, actually did not practice much in the macroscopic field back then, but was focused on how to guide the development of human history.
Most of Gaia's achievements have been invested in research on the microscopic field.
The more detailed the research on the micro field, the more stable the world view, and the easier it is for the benefits within the world view to converge on human history.
But reality sometimes makes no sense at all.
Lao Tzu's approach is to give equal weight to the macro and micro perspectives, but his attainments in the micro field are ridiculously high.
The same situation applies to Gaia. She has invested all her resources in the exploration of the microscopic field, but she has the shortcomings of a researcher who has not done anything.
By analogy, Gaia's attainments in the macro field increased rapidly, and his combat effectiveness was inexplicably high.
It is outrageous that one can create a two-digit number like Typhon with a three-digit spiritual power.
Among the three-digit figures, the second person with extremely high attainments in the microscopic field is Shennong among the Three Emperors, and the third is Ksitigarbha in Buddhism... However, Hermes has heard that this is most likely the same person.
There is a problem with Ksitigarbha’s identity.
The great aspirations of Buddhism cannot be fulfilled just because you want to.
Having a great ambition is not the most important thing; the most important thing is how widely the ambition spreads in human history.
There is a possibility that it is just the deeds of Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva, which inexplicably spread in human history. Human history will be affected by the sandbox, but it will not be completely restricted by it.
Back then, Haotian was holding the Eternal Hammer in the box garden, and the Song Dynasty in human history was unable to stop Mongolia.
Eventually, Haotian became the chief deity of the Yuan Dynasty. It was also not long after that period that Haotian disappeared in the box garden.
The Jade Emperor then sent his incarnation into human history to experience tribulations. After the fall of the Yuan Dynasty, the Jade Emperor took over the position of Heavenly Emperor by virtue of his achievements in defeating the final trial of mankind.
In this kind of major trend that affects the situation, there can be a scene where Haotian beats Changshengtian in the box garden, but the Song Dynasty lost to Mongolia, not to mention the small things.
The aspiration of Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva in human history may have spread simply because "someone found it interesting".
But if not, if Ksitigarbha's ambition is widely spread in human history because the power of the box garden is strong enough - then a problem arises.
Why does human history allow such a great degree of convergence?
Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva does not have the qualifications, and Buddhism does not have the resources. The one who can do this must be someone with an extremely high status in human history, a golden supreme VIP in human history.
There are many contributions made in human history, but there are not many resources enjoyed from human history. If the contributions of gods and Buddhas are too many, human history will naturally be disgusted; if they are too few, human history will naturally trust them.
At the beginning, Hakoniwa didn't think there was anything wrong with the legend of Ksitigarbha.
It is normal for some gods and Buddhas to appear occasionally in human history and have a great influence in a short period of time.
But the legend continues to spread... In theory it is possible, but the possibility is higher because of the conclusion.
The problem is, Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva...no one knows who he is.
If it were a mythological world, if someone was powerful enough, had profound Buddhist knowledge, and made a sincere wish, no one would think there was a problem.
But the sandbox is not a mythological world. The evaluation standard for making ambitions in the sandbox is whether it is recognized by human history.
What did you, Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva, do before you made your great vow? What deeds did you do? How much contribution did you make to human history?
Buddhist disciple?
The bald man of Sakyamuni?
Very good, the wanted criminal still dares to show off here, right?
Human history acknowledges that among all the two-digit criminals, Sakyamuni had the least merits in being swept away by two-digit criminals; among the dozen wanted criminals, Sakyamuni's crime was the lightest.
But even if you commit the lightest crime, you are still a criminal. It depends on whether human history will deal with you or not.
In the mythological world, if a Buddhist disciple makes a great wish, the heavens may give him some face, but in human history he does not get any face at all.
As Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva's status in human history continues to rise, the group of gods in the box garden seem more and more outrageous.
You may be lucky for a while, and your reputation may be enhanced due to some coincidence in human history, but you can't be lucky all the time, right?
But if Ksitigarbha's position in human history is attributed to the strong restraining power of the box garden, Ksitigarbha himself is obviously not worthy of enjoying that kind of restraining power.
The strength of the sandbox and human history will be determined based on the existing conditions of Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva himself.
In the mythological world, making a great ambition is almost equivalent to borrowing money. In the small garden world... Sorry, the loan system is not open.
This was also intentional by the earliest group of gods and Buddhas. Once a loan system is opened, there will inevitably be bad debts, and there will inevitably be people who exploit loopholes in the box.
The sandbox is a completely fair mechanism. No matter how strict the rules are, as long as the loan system is opened, some gods will inevitably find loopholes.
The ambition in the box garden is to mortgage things directly into human history.
You intend to make a grand ambition, and your ambition may be beneficial to human history, but human history is not sure whether you can succeed.
Then let’s just assume it won’t work.
You put up a sufficient price as collateral to make human history feel that it has helped you to come to an end. Even if your ambition fails, human history will not suffer a loss.
Then, the conclusion of your ambition can continue in human history.
The mechanism of the sandbox will definitely not lead to the situation of robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva made a great wish → After making the great wish, Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva’s reputation was enough to gain a strong power of convergence → So the box garden gave Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva a super strong power to converge his great wish.
This is clearly a case of demolition and relocation to repair the Western Wall.
Compared with the way of heaven in the mythological world, the essence of human history is that it cannot check and balance gods and Buddhas.
Gods and Buddhas make great wishes to the Heavenly Dao. The Heavenly Dao will take a look at your background and family assets and may reject your wishes. The Heavenly Dao does not worry that you will break the contract, but if you fail to meet the requirements, you will be punished by heaven directly.
Human history does not have this ability. After a failure, gods and Buddhas can just donate money and run away, so when agreeing to a conclusion with uncertain results, we should directly calculate the failure situation.
The party who wants to bring the matter to a close needs to deliver to human history a harvest that will make human history feel worthwhile.
If your ambition is achieved, human history will return your collateral to you. If your ambition fails, human history will not care and will take your collateral.
The ending of Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva doesn't make sense no matter how you look at it in the small garden.
Conclusions that benefit the people are easier to come by in human history, and human history also looks forward to those conclusions.
The convergence of gods and Buddhas does not bring much benefit to human history. Every bit of convergence means that you have invested a certain amount of merit in human history.
Ksitigarbha Bodhisattva does not have that accumulation, and neither does Sakyamuni.
The influence of Buddhism is not low, but the achievements of Buddhism... The biggest problem with Sakyamuni is that he was promoted too quickly.
He was bullied and suppressed by the Indian faction to advance to the second level. The other gods watched the show and felt that he might not even get through the prologue and the show ended right away.
It's like Cao Cao versus Liu Bei. Cao Cao had an army of 830,000 men, with many wise counselors and brave generals, and they were about to hunt down Liu Bei.
The audience was watching the excitement, wondering what Liu Bei should do? Would he rather die than surrender? Or temporarily avoid the limelight?
Then Liu Bei stood on the top of the city wall, closed his eyes, and sighed, “I understand.”
Suddenly, golden lotuses appeared from the sky and the ground. Liu Bei killed 830,000 soldiers with a slap of his hand and ascended to heaven to become an immortal, the kind that could indirectly interfere with the lower world.