Page 403
It is not about viewing the decadent trend as a disaster that destroys everything, but rather viewing the decadent trend as the cornerstone for promoting the development of the sandbox.
It is precisely because of the decadent trend that the gods will continue to develop the sandbox, and can only continue to develop the sandbox and human history.
The same is true of the attitude of the sandbox. The sandbox itself has a decadent trend, which is a mechanism that destroys itself, but the expectation of the sandbox for itself is to continuously develop itself.
Because of this, Zoroastrianism had a unique advantage in the box garden - which led to the Zoroastrianism being somewhat careless back then.
Other gods and Buddhas are still wondering why the universal truth of "good" fell into the hands of Zoroastrianism, but Zoroastrianism itself did not take it seriously.
White Night Demon?
Does Bai Yasha deserve it?
From the concept of source, Shiroyasha occupied the creative concept of the box garden, and theoretically should indeed grasp the universal truth of good.
But what was the situation in the box garden at that time?
'Existence' and 'development' are undoubtedly both 'good'.
'Existence' is the foundation, but 'development' was the mainstream trend of the sandbox at that time!
The core of the box garden is expanding outward at a high speed, and the progress of human history is advancing rapidly. At this time, what's wrong with their Zoroastrian gods obtaining the universal truth of goodness through their worldview that best fits the needs of the box garden's development?
And if I remember correctly, when we created the small garden, this cosmic truth was created by us Zoroastrians, right?
There are also two attitudes within Zoroastrianism regarding its worldview.
The two internal attitudes are not completely divided by good and evil. Whether it is a good god or an evil god, since they have joined the group of gods, at least they will not openly question the group's theories.
Within Zoroastrianism, some people are more optimistic and believe that their goals can be achieved, while other people are more pessimistic and feel that although they are willing to work hard for this goal, they do not think it is difficult to succeed.
The mother of evil is the latter.
When the Zoroastrianism of the past was deciding the number of gods with a three-digit sum and a two-digit transcendent, it chose the Mother of Evil to break through the two-digit number.
I think the Zoroastrian world view can be realized in the small garden, and I can serve as a three-digit god king.
Those who feel that the Zoroastrian worldview is difficult to achieve in the box garden can go to the two-digit number to provide support for the group of gods.
The good gods who remained in the three-digit numbers were relatively optimistic, but the Mother of Evil herself became more and more pessimistic as the box garden developed.
There is a threat of decadence, so the gods should develop the box garden as much as possible, even if the interests of the gods and Buddhas are sometimes damaged in the process - the Zoroastrian concept of the gods group, which is put into the box garden, is this concept.
There is no problem in theory.
As human history develops, even if the gods and Buddhas in the small garden gradually reduce their interference in human history and human history becomes longer, the gods and Buddhas in the small garden can still gain a lot of achievements.
If the gods and Buddhas in the box garden do not give up their share of the merits, human history will not continue to move forward. Not only will the gods and Buddhas not get any merits, but if time drags on for too long, a trend of decadence will come.
In this situation, wouldn't it be more beneficial for the gods and Buddhas if they collectively let go of some of their interference in human history?
It's easy to make a judgment.
But in reality, the problem is too big.
Let the gods take out the sovereignty of human history that they can use to share the credit?
Yes, this sovereignty does require the continued advancement of human history to settle new achievements... But there are so many gods and Buddhas in the box garden, why should we gods let go first? Why should we let go of the areas where we gods have the largest share first?
According to the Zoroastrian worldview, you gods have to know what is good for you. Look at the decadent trend in the distance. If you don't let go of some of your interference in human history, there will be nothing left.
Do you want money (merit) or life?
Zoroastrianism believes that in this situation, the gods of the box garden can sort out the pros and cons.
The gods in the little garden are too clear-headed. If the sky falls, the tall ones will hold it up.
We support your Zoroastrian worldview in theory, but as the date of the coming of the wind of decadence is getting closer...you ask me if I am anxious or not, of course I am.
You large groups of gods, super large groups of gods, why haven’t you thought of a solution yet?
Urgent, urgent, urgent, urgent! Hurry up, if you don’t think of a solution, the wind of decadence will come.
To a certain extent, the conflict between Zoroastrianism and Yahweh was not purely instigated by Yahweh, but it just happened that the universal truth of "goodness" that Yahweh needed was in the hands of Zoroastrianism.
If it is not there, then if Yahweh wants to get the universal truth of "good", it will inevitably be Zoroastrianism that comes to cause trouble for Yahweh.
The goodness of the box garden is continuation. Yahweh borrowed the universal truth of goodness at that time so that the creatures in the box garden would have a glimmer of hope when the box garden was destroyed.
When the wind of decadence appears in the box garden, the ark of salvation appears at the same time, protecting the lives in the box garden from the crisis of extinction and reaching a new world.
After the Ark becomes a two-digit number and is called a part of the box garden, it can definitely be saved, but how many people can be saved depends on the spiritual ratio of the Ark and the Decadence Wind.
To engrave this mechanism of salvation into the box, one naturally needs the universal truth of "goodness". Salvation is continuation and is good.
But Yahweh's behavior is completely contrary to the definition of Zoroastrianism.
What Zoroastrianism needs is to maintain the threat of decadence to the gods, because because of this evil, the gods will devote themselves to the development of human history.
What Zoroastrianism wants to do is to completely block the retreat routes of the gods of the box garden, making it impossible for them to abandon their existing box gardens. When faced with the decadent trend, they cannot even escape, and can only coexist and perish with the box garden.
The gods can only live and die with the box garden, and then the gods will regard the box garden as their own home.
Even if the development of the box garden requires temporarily sacrificing the interests of the gods, I believe that the gods will be willing to give up that part of the benefits after hesitation.
When the gods regard the small garden as their inseparable home, decadence will never appear.
Yahweh's ark of salvation needs the universal truth of good. If the universal truth of good is in the hands of others, Zoroastrianism will definitely be the first to come to help.
This behavior of opening up the threat of decadence is completely contrary to the attitude of Zoroastrianism, and the two are enemies that cannot be avoided at all costs.
Among the many groups of gods, Zoroastrianism is undoubtedly the staunch supporter of the box garden.
The Indian gods are die-hard supporters of the box garden because of their own interests, the fact that the position of the Indian God King has not been determined, and the fact that India does not have a two-digit number, among other factors.
But for Zoroastrianism, supporting the box garden is the Zoroastrian ideal.
The more dangerous the box garden is, the more Zoroastrianism will not give up. What Zoroastrianism wants is danger, and because of this danger, it can serve as a warning to the gods.
The more extreme the evil, the more good it can bring. When the crisis of the destruction of the box garden is really before their eyes, the gods and Buddhas will reflect on their own actions.
Moreover, if the small box garden is still there at that time, when operating the small box garden in the future, the gods and Buddhas will think of the lessons learned in the past and repent.
If we only consider it from the perspective of interests, it would be more beneficial for Zoroastrianism to rebuild the box garden.
There are two-digit and three-digit gods in the group of gods, and their power is also average in human history. Even so, if the box garden is rebuilt, with a two-digit strong figure like the Mother of Evil, Zoroastrianism cannot be worse than it is now.
But for Zoroastrianism, the more extreme the box garden becomes and the more it faces the crisis of destruction, the greater the opportunity for them to realize their own theory of the gods.
When faced with disasters and dangers, other groups of gods may think of escaping. Even some selfless idealists are willing to take action to resolve the danger, but that does not mean these people do not find these dangers difficult to deal with.
But Zoroastrianism sees the dangers of the box garden as opportunities.
Of the two systems within Zoroastrianism, the side of the good god tends to be orderly in its approach.
He felt that his own theory of the god group was feasible, and he continued to expand his own god group. He thought that as long as his own god group had a high enough influence, other god groups would follow their ideas and devote themselves wholeheartedly to the development of the box garden and human history under the threat of decadence.
But the evil side also believes in Zoroastrianism, but feels that the gods have too many selfish desires.
If the fire doesn't reach their eyebrows, many gods will just stand by and watch, waiting for others to put out the fire. The plan cannot go so smoothly.
You think evil is a stepping stone to good, so is it really evil?
Do you think that under the threat of decadence, the gods will work together to develop the small garden? Will the gods really do that?
That is just a theory of the Zoroastrian gods, not reality.
This is the idea of the Mother of Evil.
As one of the founders of Zoroastrianism, the Mother of Evil naturally would not oppose the views of Zoroastrianism.
Her idea was purely that I felt that the Zoroastrian gods' concept was difficult to realize, but no matter how difficult it was, I would try. The real world might not be like what the Zoroastrian gods said, but I hoped that the world could become that way.
—Then, with a unanimous vote from the Zoroastrian gods, she was promoted to the second rank.
If we think about the method of realizing the God Group Theory from the perspective of evil and pessimism, the means of action will be somewhat extreme.
——For example, creating some final trials for mankind, so that the gods in the box garden will face the crisis of destruction from time to time.
Find a way to let the decadent wind show up more often in the small garden, and deepen the gods' fear of the decadent wind.
After Zoroastrianism becomes the only one in the box garden, it will completely block the way for three-digit numbers to become two-digit numbers. No matter who wants to become a two-digit number, it will directly use the three-digit numbers of its own group of gods to attack them, and exchange lives with the opponent when the opponent is attacked by the Wind of Decadence.
No one in the small garden dared to exceed two digits, so there was no subjective violation, and no one could avoid the threat of decadent wind.
Unlike nowadays, two-digit people can violate the rules to a certain extent, and are even willing to risk their lives to try to violate the rules in the core area of the small garden.
For the Zoroastrianism at that time, the idea of the Mother of Evil was undoubtedly too extreme.
The box garden at that time was not the box garden of today. In the primitive period, human history and box garden developed rapidly, and Zoroastrianism also developed well. There was no need to take overly extreme measures.
——Then Zoroastrianism was crippled by Yahweh.
Subsequently, human history and sandbox have developed to this day.
The killing judgment of the final trial of mankind has been changed, and the spirit of absolute evil is about to expand to the limit. Human history would rather perish together with the box garden than continue to summarize human history for a hundred years. The wind of decadence is already approaching.
Chapter 53
The adult woman dressed in black sighed.
Plans cannot keep up with changes. She had originally planned to return to the small garden after crossing absolute evil, but when she actually carried it out, she found that something went wrong.
At that time, she illegally interfered with the final trial of mankind, and her spirit was damaged by the attack of the wind of decadence.
She really couldn't guarantee that she would remain unscathed by the decadent wind, but that didn't prevent her from being hurt on purpose.
It was because of the damage to her spiritual power that it was easier for her to fall from double digits to triple digits.
In the heyday of the double-digit figures, their worldview is mostly complete, although this completeness is bound to have loopholes if you look closely.
To reduce the double digits to triple digits, one needs to give all of one's spiritual data to the box garden and put oneself under the observation of the box garden - but the so-called all can actually be compromised.
Is it okay if I forget?
After being attacked by the Wind of Decadence, she was in a state of damaged spirit.
On the spiritual level, part of the spiritual structure was destroyed, and on the memory level, that part of the spiritual data was also directly forgotten by her.
But just because it’s forgotten doesn’t mean it can’t be recalculated.
Theoretically, she doesn't have even the slightest memory of that part of her own spiritual nature.
But in fact, on a test paper, the first question is 1+1=2, the second question is blank, and the third question is 3+3=6... Can you still not guess what the second question is?
Moreover, you deleted the second question yourself to remind yourself.
Of course, the worldview is not as simple as 1+1=2. Every rule within the worldview is very complicated. But since the person involved has subjectively "forgotten" it, the forgotten part is naturally easier to deduce.