Page 330

Page 330

By comparing and observing, you can study the internal logic of things, and it will not be too late until the problem of the sand tray is completely solved.

You should do what you should do at the stage you are in. If Su Qing, a rookie who just reached four figures, wants to comprehend the truth from the logic between the worlds...

It’s not a question of whether he can do it, but even if he can do it, it will take too much experience and time.

It’s not like I’m playing a Souls-like game, I just want to suffer… When I encounter a difficult boss, of course I can suffer to hone my skills in a game, but in the real world, who would fight a difficult boss to the death?

It's difficult to fight, so you must find a place to level up first.

It won’t be too late to consider those things that are too profound until he grows up.

Putting aside the logic outside the sandbox, if you want to construct a worldview, the exploration of the worldview inside the sandbox does provide many entry points for newcomers.

——That is not a good thing in the sandbox. Others have researched ways to construct a worldview, naturally for the purpose of charging a fee. Others hold the sovereignty in this regard, and you have to pay if you want to use it.

Constructing a worldview outside the sandbox is much more relaxed. You have registered a patent for the method of constructing a worldview in the sandbox. What does it have to do with my wrong world?

This is also one of the difficulties in constructing a worldview.

The construction of the worldview in the sandbox is becoming more and more complicated. At the beginning, it is enough to come up with a worldview that is different from the real world. However, with the understanding of the world and the world by the predecessors, it is naturally much easier for later generations to follow the path opened up by the predecessors - but if you want to follow the path taken by the predecessors, you have to pay.

In human history, if someone quotes Tang poetry or Song lyrics, or Buddhist or Taoist scriptures, it is naturally a casual quotation. The people who created these have long died in human history and will not jump out to collect copyright fees from you.

But in the box garden, those big guys who paved the way for future generations are not dead.

It's a road that someone else has opened up during his lifetime. Since you want to use it... what's wrong with charging you some copyright fees?

Not to mention that those big guys are not dead, even if they are dead, they must have been beaten to death for some reason or offended someone, right?

Outsiders are also not allowed to use it at will. The sovereignty of "creating XX theory" is in the hands of the victor. If outsiders want to use it, they can only go to the victor to purchase the usage rights.

I have to say that the setting of the box garden in this regard is a bit special.

Taking human history as an example, any well-known physicist in the 21st century would have more knowledge than Newton if he were to live in Newton’s era.

Some people would say that this is because the two sides are in different environments. If Newton was born in the 21st century, if Newton lived to the 21st century, no one could imagine what achievements he could have made.

——There is no such dispute in the sandbox.

If physicists after Newton were summoned to the sandbox and wanted their research and development results to take effect in the sandbox, they had to pay taxes to Newton to share their merits.

It is difficult to compare the pros and cons of the predecessors, because the theories of the predecessors are based on the research of their predecessors... It is easy to compare in the sand tray. By simply looking at the achievements that both parties finally hold, we can judge how much role each party played in the birth of a certain research.

The copyright fees of the sandplay are roughly divided into two types. One is charged by the sandplay core. Researchers develop their own theories and submit the theories to the sandplay core. People who use the theories in the future can use them without finding the researchers, and the researchers have no way to withdraw their theories.

The second is to hold it firmly in your own hands, and others have to get your approval before they can use it.

Only by giving the management rights to the core of the box garden can it be beneficial to its spread in human history.

Just like Newton's laws of mechanics, Newton submitted his research results to the sand tray, and then extended them to human history from the sand tray. This is naturally feasible.

But if Newton wanted to solidify that sovereignty and achieve 'without my permission, no one else may add a mechanical framework to their own worldview'... naturally it would not be possible to converge on a large scale within human history.

Human history would think, who do you think you are? Without you, no one else would be able to develop similar things, right?

Products like Buddhism and Taoism, which are full of the personal color of their founders, are not firmly controlled by their founders.

Lao Tzu wrote the Tao Te Ching and founded Taoism, but that does not mean that outsiders cannot interpret the Tao Te Ching. Not all the sovereignty of the Tao Te Ching lies with Lao Tzu.

It's not to the point where no one else can use it at all as long as he doesn't want to.

The more dispersed the sovereignty is, and the more it is handed over to the core notarization of the box, the easier it will be to converge into human history and hold it firmly in one's own hands. The tighter the parties hold on to sovereignty, the more difficult it will be to converge into human history.

It can even be said that if one wants to completely control sovereignty, some sovereigns do not have that option from the beginning.

The mysteries are understood from nature, and thus a sovereignty is born. In theory, the developer of this sovereignty is you, but in reality it is you and the world.

During the development process, the greater the role your factors play, the greater your right to dispose of sovereignty; the greater the role the world plays, the lower your right to dispose of sovereignty.

From the moment a part of sovereignty is born, there is no possibility that the parties will not allow others to use the successful research they have done. Instead, it is directly notarized and operated by the core of the sandbox.

The parties concerned have no right to prevent others from using their research results, but can only obtain the credit that belongs to them after outsiders cite their research results.

In the box garden, the more external things of the pantheon are, the more they are held in the hands of the core of the box garden because they want to converge with human history, and even the pantheon itself finds it difficult to change them.

In the judgment of human history, the sandplay core is credible and reliable. The sandplay core serves as the main body to conclude human history, and human history will pass the judgment and feel that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.

The gods are the main body of human history... How can human history know when you gods will run away? How can we know whether you gods will take the opportunity of the conclusion to maliciously interfere in human history?

After all, human beings are weak, pitiful and helpless. If the gods really seize the opportunity to do something to them, human beings will have no ability to resist. If they want to resist, they can only give birth to the final trial of human beings and overturn the table. But the problem is that it is not a big deal because the gods have done such a small thing.

If human history agrees to conclude, God can use that opportunity to do something, but human history is powerless - then human history simply won't allow the gods to conclude. If the gods insist on fixing the outcome, they can only do it one world at a time.

The lower the level of favor, the more executive power is held in the hands of the core of the box garden, and the box garden gods only enjoy the right to share.

For example, Norse mythology was compiled by the Norse gods. If the Norse gods feel that the existing mythology system is not good and want to change it...

You can change it. Under the existing mythology system, you can make up a few epics to cover the existing results, and then notarize them to the outside world.

——With that much consumption, it would be better to abandon the existing system and rebuild a new group of gods with the original team.

If the Nordic gods want to abandon their sovereignty, the core of the box garden and human history will not care about it.

But if the Norse gods want to destroy that sovereignty and make all the stories about Norse mythology disappear from human history...

Can't do it.

Norse mythology has been released to human history through the Sandbox Core platform. Can you revoke it just because you want to?

You have torn up your own sovereignty, the contract and the bank card for payment. That is your own problem. You will not get any share of the profits.

Tearing up a paper contract invalidates it? What the hell is that?

Precisely because there is no way to withdraw, myths can be passed down in human history. If the gods hold the sovereignty of myths and want people in human history to forget, then humans can only forget... It would be strange if human history could accept such a conclusion.

The more grassroots the favor is, the more the gods will only have the power to share it.

Similarly, the more core the favor is, the more firmly the gods hold it in their hands.

After all, the core benefits do not need to be concluded.

It’s like, most groups of gods have their own logic in constructing their worldview.

Do the Norse gods need to let people in human history know this?

No need, we just need to let some of the four-digit numbers know that the Nordic gods hold this secret, and I am willing to sell it as long as you do me a favor... It won’t take long to notify all the four-digit numbers one by one.

Chapter 102

One of the benefits of coming to a different world is that you don’t have to worry about the complicated sovereignty issues in the small garden.

Of course, Su Qing only had a superficial understanding of the secret of how the gods constructed their worldview. When he was in the sandbox, he felt that his knowledge was a bit far from building a worldview, so he just had a simple understanding of it.

The most difficult part about constructing a worldview is not how to know the secrets of how other gods construct their worldviews, but the difficulty lies precisely in not knowing.

Sovereignty is roughly equivalent to the patent of the small garden.

Even if you don't even know who Newton is, and you understood the laws of mechanics by being hit on the head by a watermelon, if you want to construct a worldview based on the laws of mechanics that you have understood, the core of the box garden will still give the credit to Newton from you.

The box garden pays great attention to the judgment of personal will. Similar to Leticia, even if all her property is completely plundered by the Demon King, she will listen to others' orders to commit suicide. However, when others order her to hand over the favor bound to her soul, she has the right to refuse.

Because the sandbox attaches great importance to the judgment of "self" and "personal will", the core of the sandbox will not observe personal will too deeply, but will leave part of the thinking space to humans. Su Qing thinks that it may also be because of the uncertainty of human thinking, which makes it easy for logical errors to occur in sandbox observations.

In short, even if someone has no idea who Newton is, but understands Newton's laws of mechanics, it will be of no use.

The core of the sandbox will not observe your thoughts and memories, thereby confirming that your research results have nothing to do with Newton. As long as you use the research results in the sandbox, you need to hand in the credit to Newton.

In the sandbox, the predecessors have certainly paved the way for the later generations. For those who know the research results and contributions of their predecessors, it is not excessive to give some credit - but those later generations who have achieved the same results as their predecessors are pure victims.

Not knowing the research results of predecessors is very fatal when building a worldview.

It's not that the person who has researched the results first does not allow you to use his results. The results you have researched are kept in your hands, and are strictly prohibited from being used by others... Holding them so tightly means that human history does not accept his request for convergence and diffusion, which means that in the judgment of the core of the box garden, the importance of his thing is very low.

Patents must be registered, and whoever registers first owns it.

If you simply hold it in your hand, it will not be registered in the judgment of the box garden, or only a trivial thing will be registered.

If someone else later develops similar results to yours, even if the difference is only one percent, and they are willing to submit the results to the Sandbox Core for notarization and incorporate them into human history, then the patent belongs to them.

In the small garden, there is no such thing as a four-digit number constructing a worldview and suddenly finding that the worldview theory you have in mind collides with the worldview theory of other gods somewhere, and you are not allowed to use that theory, which leads to failure.

Either the gods have already handed those theories over to the Sandbox for notarization, and they can be used without the gods' permission.

Either the group of gods holds those theories firmly in their hands, and you comprehend the same worldview theory, then that theory is yours.

The core of the sand tray will not easily observe personal will, so it is difficult to determine whether when a theory spreads, later generations who develop the same theory are completely unaffected by the former. Some influences are not even known to the parties themselves, let alone the possible indirect influences.

Someone knows the laws of mechanics discovered by Newton, and then asks his grandson, who knows nothing about mechanics, to study mechanics. What will happen if the results are achieved?

What about letting his own son visit some suggestive little models in his grandson's room?

What if it wasn't him who hinted at it, but his son who also didn't know the laws of mechanics bought the model by chance? How would we calculate it?

What if the son accidentally bought some suggestive models because his grandfather happened to invite the vendors to put those models in the most conspicuous place?

No one knows whether a theory that has already been born has an indirect impact on later researchers who develop exactly the same theory.

In this kind of judgment, if we only consider the will of the later researchers themselves, we will not be able to draw the correct conclusion. If we continue to proceed externally, it will be endless. Suggestions, prophecies, hypnosis, two-digit interference, etc., it will be difficult for the sand tray to completely filter out.

If the sand tray normally observes the will of everyone, this kind of problem can be judged. There is no way to normally observe the will of everyone in the sand tray. You can't make a fuss and observe the will of all the parties involved just because of a small patent judgment.

But the core of the box garden will not indulge those pioneers. The logic that you developed first has already spread to the outside. I really have no way of calculating whether the later ones who figured out the same logic were influenced by you.

——If you have those secrets hidden deep inside and haven't revealed them to the outside world and others come up with the same thing, don't expect me to protect your patents.

For example, Nordic countries explicitly informed a four-digit number of their internal method of constructing a worldview. Without Nordic countries' permission, these four-digit number could not use the method even if they knew it.

The Nordic behavior is roughly equivalent to letting you take a look at the goods first before discussing whether the deal can be successful.

Outsiders have no idea how the Nordic gods built their worldview, but they all figured out the same thing - in the judgment of the sandbox, this is purely what the parties involved figured out themselves.

Even if this person has a few friends in the Nordic God group and has been indirectly hinted at, the box garden doesn't care.

The management rights to construct the secrets of the world view are not in the core of the box garden. The Nordic countries hold the management rights firmly. If there are problems within your Nordic group of gods and the secrets of the gods are leaked, you will naturally be responsible for it.

In the box garden, the four-digit number will not be blocked from advancing just because the worldview logic it has developed is the same as that in the hands of a certain group of gods and is not allowed to be used by that group of gods. Even if you were actually hinted by some god friends or even if you eavesdropped, the core of the box garden will not stop you.

The problem lies in the mysteries of the gods that have already been made public.

When four-digit figures are building their worldview, they are really afraid of failure. Not all four-digit figures have the family background that Su Qing has.