Page 331
When building the worldview, the parties involved felt that the five elements generate each other, and gold generates water... It was estimated that 10 units of energy were invested to shape gold and produce 8 units of water.
However, when investing resources, because the Taoist system has already announced that gold produces water within the box garden, if you want to use this public concept, you need to hand in your merits.
Of the 10 units of energy invested, 3 were transferred to the Taoist gods by the core of the box garden, and only 7 units of gold and 5 units of water were generated, which naturally did not match the subsequent world view model.
It is already very tight for a four-digit number to build a worldview based on its own energy share. If there is a mistake in such a small matter, it is okay if it happens once or twice, but if it happens too many times, the worldview cannot be constructed at all.
Of course, in this concept of the mutual generation of the five elements, no one would fail to include the concept of handing in merits, as this concept is too famous.
You used Arabic numerals in your worldview. Isn't it too much to give some credit to the Indians who created Arabic numerals? Isn't it too much to give some credit to the Arabs who spread Arabic numerals?
You used pi in your worldview, so it's not too much to give some of the credit to the generations of mathematicians who figured out pi, right?
In human history, these data can naturally be used at will, but in the sandbox, if four-digit numbers want to construct a worldview, they need to give some credit to the ancestors who developed these data.
——The ancestors may not accept the credit, but there is no way to prevent outsiders from using their research results on the premise that they do not take the credit.
This is also the importance of the gods in the box garden.
For example, there is a four-digit number who wants to construct a Taoist worldview. During the construction process, he has read Taoist theories thoroughly, but he does not intend to join Taoism... It originally requires a four-digit power scale to construct the worldview, but he has to hand over a part of his power at every step as the price of using the Taoist research results.
Then the power of these four digits that is actually used to build a worldview may be only half.
And if you are willing to join the group of gods, the four-digit people within the group will construct the worldview, and of course it is impossible for them to charge the patent fee.
Even if patent fees are really collected, they will not be collected when the person involved is promoted.
First, completely lift the restrictions and allow the parties to reach three digits without hindrance based on their four-digit power scale... Then collect patent fees when they can reach three digits.
For example, let the three-digit people who are being promoted find some boring but important place to work for a hundred years.
For Shenqun, it doesn’t matter when the patent fee is collected. Anyway, you have used my theory and provided me with some credit.
But for a four-digit breakthrough, the difference between collecting patent fees during the breakthrough process and collecting patent fees after the breakthrough is too big.
As for outsiders, if they borrow the theoretical breakthroughs of some god groups and do not charge for the patent fees during the breakthrough but charge hundreds of times more for the patents after the breakthrough, it can be regarded as the god groups giving you face.
This kind of obvious obstacle is easy to deal with, the real key lies in some theories that are clearly notarized and operated by the core of the sandbox, but are still not very famous.
The scope of sand table notarization is very wide.
The theory of the mutual generation and restraint of the five elements can be understood by a four-digit number. When borrowing, part of the merits handed over to Taoism will be included in it.
The problem is that those who are clearly in the notarized state of the sand garden are not famous.
From the perspective of Taoism, the entire Taoist canon is the scope that Taoism has handed over to the core of the box garden for fair operation.
Ordinary people would get a headache when seeing the Daozang, but four-digit numbers certainly wouldn’t.
To construct a worldview, many four-digit numbers require reading the Taoist Canon, Buddhist scriptures, the Bible, etc. first, so that you can understand the theories in these systems, and then compare them with your own worldview theories, find out the similarities, and calculate how many merits you need to submit for the similarities - this is actually not a loss.
Not everyone is Su Qing. Su Qing can now acquire knowledge through observation and analysis of the core of the sandbox, and does not really need a systematic worldview theory in the sandbox.
But 99% of the four-digit numbers must first know the experiments of constructing the worldview of each pantheon, so that they can summarize how to construct their own worldview through those theories.
We have indeed borrowed other people's theories, so it is only natural that we should give some credit to them.
The problem lies with those groups of gods that have perished. Those groups of gods have perished, but the achievements they created have not been destroyed.
The theories of those extinct groups of gods can still be found if you look carefully in the box garden, but because the groups of gods that operated those theories no longer exist, only relatively fragmented theories can be found.
Assuming that Taoism has completely died out, some four-digit people can naturally read the Taoist Canon if they want. Whether they collect it from human history or from other pantheons' understanding of Taoism, they can find a large amount of Taoist Canon.
——But a lot is not all.
Go to Taoism to look for it. Taoism can tell you that the theories we have submitted to the sand tray for notarization are definitely not complete if you look for them in other places.
If similar theories happen to be applied during the construction, it will become an emergency.
The originally planned worldview and the amount of energy invested in a certain aspect must be adjusted urgently when something goes wrong.
Although Taoism still exists in the box, there are many groups of gods that have been destroyed in the box, such as ancient Babylon.
But ancient Babylon has a high status in human history and is part of the origin of human civilization.
Similar to the Mayan civilization, although the Mayan civilization was destroyed in human history, the Quetzalcoatl is still there in the box garden. This situation is actually very friendly to four-digit numbers. By looking for the Quetzalcoatl, you can find out where the parts of the Mayan civilization that were handed over to the box garden for notarization are.
The four-digit number in the small garden is getting bigger and bigger.
The early four-digit numbers certainly require familiarity with various theories...but the number of Taoist canons in the early days and the number of Taoist canons today are two different concepts.
Theoretically speaking, as humans progress, the upper limit of the power of four-digit numbers will become higher and higher. The stronger humans become, the higher the four-digit standard of "destroying human history in a single world" will be.
At the same time, with the development of the sandbox, the standards for promotion to four-digit numbers are getting higher and higher. The level of detailed worldview that the predecessors were able to advance to, the later generations can also be promoted when they reach that standard - but in the process, the later generations must hand over their achievements to the predecessors whose theories they used.
The development of the sandbox has always been like this, but the development of human history seems to be much slower.
In primitive society, the standard for destroying a single world in human history was star shattering. If the earth was gone, humans would certainly be gone. But if the earth was still there, even in the face of volcanoes, tsunamis, and meteorite impacts... there was no way to guarantee the complete extinction of humans.
Human history at least has the potential to survive.
In the 21st century, the standard for destroying human history is still star-shattering. Nuclear bombs and other weapons are useless against star-shattering-scale attacks.
As human history develops, the scale of power of four-digit numbers increases, and as the sandbox develops, four-digit numbers need to hand over the achievements to their predecessors, and the scale of power that can be used in constructing the worldview gradually decreases.
The two should offset each other and ensure the healthy growth of the sandbox.
In the past, some people used the scale of Broken Stars to construct the worldview, and later, some people used the scale of Broken Stars +. After handing over part of the merits to their predecessors, they still used the scale of the power of Broken Stars to construct the worldview - in this way, it can ensure that the upper level of the box garden is full of vitality, and from time to time there will be geniuses who do not rely on large groups of gods, and can become three-digit people and build another god system.
nowadays……
The difficulty of constructing the world view in the box garden has increased, but there is no progress in human history, and the four-digit power limit has not been increased.
Gradually, it is becoming increasingly difficult for four-digit numbers to become three-digit numbers. In the past, four-digit numbers needed to use the power scale of the Shattered Star to construct a worldview. Now, if four-digit numbers do not join the group of gods, they can only construct a worldview with the power scale of Shattered Star-, Shattered Star--.
The number of people who can reach three digits will naturally become fewer and fewer, and it is even more unrealistic to expect newcomers to form a group of gods.
As a result, the structure of the upper level of the box garden has basically not changed. The only group of gods that have appeared recently are the Cthulhu gods that are not accepted by the box garden.
The way it appears is not the rise of the bottom layer of the box garden, but the observation after the box garden expands.
Chapter 103
To construct a worldview, the first step is to pry open the gap between you and the world and disrupt the cause and effect relationship between you and the world.
Compared to constructing a worldview in a small garden, using the experience of predecessors but being subject to many constraints, the advantage of being in a different world is that although you are borrowing the experience of predecessors, in the judgment of the world, you are the first one to develop that method.
But... this needs to be put in quotation marks first.
Su Qing thought about what method he should use to disrupt his own worldview and the real world among the many methods of constructing the worldview in the sandbox.
Indian gods...it's hard to say that all Indian gods have the same worldview. At least Brahma's own worldview starts with dreams and then lets dreams shine into reality.
The rules of dreams are completely different from reality, but the repulsive force caused by the difference does not act on the "difference points", but will trace the source and act on Brahma's "dream".
No matter how bizarre the rules of Brahma's dream are, it is Brahma's dream as a whole that is rejected by reality because of its difference.
Only when the causal relationship between oneself and the world view is cut off can the system one constructs be called a world view.
It doesn’t mean that once you construct a worldview you will be detached from the current world.
It’s like breaking the laws of a country. If you are sent to jail by this country for breaking the law, you are naturally a member of this country.
If you are hated by the people of this country because you violated the laws of this country, and the people of this country send troops to attack you, then in terms of hierarchy, you are naturally equal to this country.
Do not disrupt the causal relationship between you and the world. Even if you are strong, everything is clear in the eyes of the world. It is equivalent to going to jail for committing a crime, or not going to jail for the crime you committed. Even if it has not started yet, the result has been determined.
The causal relationship is disrupted, and causality becomes uncertain. The world rejects you because you change the reality, but causality falls on the step of rejection.
You make the rules of some areas within reality different. The more different they are, the more reality will reject you.
It is equivalent to that you do not respect the customs of other countries, so other countries send troops to attack you. The more disrespectful you are, the more troops other countries will send, and the greater the repulsion will be - but they may not necessarily catch you, and this repulsion will not necessarily cause your worldview to collapse.
The core difference between the two does not lie in strength, but in the fact that the world is not clear about what the final outcome will be.
Brahma of India uses dreams as the medium through which the cause and effect of his worldview and the real world are distorted. There are some similar ones in the sandbox.
However, the box garden is a universe created by God, and the world of Dicuo is not created by God. It is the same as the box garden before the core of the box garden existed, and it is a real universe.
When Su Qing constructed his worldview, it was naturally impossible for him to learn from the three-digit number in the box garden.
The three-digit worldview constructed in the sand tray faces the core of the sand tray, while the two-digit worldview faces the real world.
The subtle rules of one world to another are definitely different, but Su Qing feels that to construct a worldview in the real world, one must borrow the experience of constructing a worldview in the real world. Even if the rules are different, the experience is not false.
The experience that can be used to construct a worldview in the small garden may not be useful in the real world - although Su Qing feels that even if it is useless, it is only a three-digit dish in the small garden, not really useless.
The three-digit Brahmas in the sandbox construct their worldview based on dreams. They may not be able to survive in the real world, but there is definitely a Brahma who can do it.
In all the heavens and worlds, there must be a Brahma stronger than the Brahma in the box garden, not to mention that there may be a prototype - if the Brahma in the box garden is not good enough, it is definitely only him personally, not the upper limit of the worldview constructed by dreams.
But Su Qing was just borrowing his experience, and he would definitely find those that could be done in the small box.
But when it comes to the field of two-digit numbers, Su Qing doesn't know much, especially in the box garden. There are not many two-digit numbers who are willing to share their experience in constructing a worldview...even if they only spread out the most superficial part.
Among the two-digit numbers, there are mysterious dragons like Haotian and Mother of Evil who are hard to find, there are World Dragons who wander outside the box garden all year round, and there are dead stay-at-homes like Box Zhou who will not leave the box garden until the end of the day.
The two of them have a thousand and one strange ideas, but there are only three of them who have the demeanor of a master and can speak of the most superficial template of their own way of constructing the worldview.
Jesus, Buddha, Laozi.
——A major missionary.
Jesus’ experience cannot be used yet. A large part of Jesus’ spirituality, including his becoming a two-digit number, is closely related to Yavi.
Shakyamuni's two-digit experience made his own worldview a medium of different cause and effect in the outside world, which can be summed up in one sentence.
Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.
Lao Tzu's two-digit experience can be summed up in one sentence.
Mysterious and mystical, the door to all wonders.
To put it more simply, in the real world, one plus one equals two. Although one and two are both human definitions, the phenomenon that one plus one equals two is determined by the world. Humans simply name certain factors in that phenomenon as one and two.
Whether it is binary or decimal, it is humans who define the phenomenon using their own concepts.
According to Sakyamuni, the internal worldview logic is "it makes no difference whether one plus one equals two or three, it's the same."
According to Laozi, the internal worldview logic is "Does one plus one really equal two? Let's compare them."