Page 332
Sakya's worldview is certainly not a false argument with the real world, but rather reflects a pluralistic worldview, but it is different from Yawei's pluralistic worldview.
In Yawei's multiple worldviews, each worldview has its own philosophy. Yawei has constructed so many worldviews because she believes that God should satisfy human prayers, but this is only her logic of action. She will not reflect her logic of action in the constructed worldview.
Under the same logic of her own actions, the worldviews she constructed are not the same. If we have to say the only similarity, it is that those worldviews are all derived from the human perspective, and Yawei herself simply turned human prayers for her into a worldview.
Shakyamuni has multiple worldviews, and each of them leads to the same ending, the Pure Land.
Within each of Shakyamuni's worldviews, there are certain differences on the surface, but the core is the same.
Generally speaking, Shakyamuni's philosophy is, 'No matter what the parameters are within the worldview, no matter whether you are earth, water, fire, wind, yin and yang, or the five elements, no matter whether your fate is predetermined or unknown, no matter whether you are human or divine, I will lead you to the paradise.'
This is what Shakyamuni meant by 'form is emptiness, emptiness is form', and his 'it makes no difference whether one plus one equals two or three'.
No matter what it equals, the result is the Paradise, different causes, same result.
Of course, that is the final form of Shakya's concept. If Shakya could really achieve this, he would have been invincible in the box garden long ago.
Su Qing thought about it for a moment and felt that this was not something that someone like him, who was only at the kindergarten level in the worldview construction course, could achieve - let alone him, the Buddhists in the box garden were also confused.
Sakya's skill in constructing a worldview is something that only a genius can do. If one can comprehend it clearly, the chances of becoming a three-digit figure using this skill are indeed high.
When others construct their worldview, no matter if they will come up with some new tricks in the later stage, such as the nine worlds of the Norse pantheon, they must make it as simple as possible at the beginning.
If you want to have more worlds within the worldview under the same concept, you can start with three digits and then expand.
However, Buddhism’s worldview has been pluralistic from the very beginning. While it constructs multiple worlds, the end point of each world is the Pure Land.
So how can we construct multiple worlds with one idea using four digits?
The Buddha picked up a flower and smiled: You will slowly understand it.
It's a simple thing. I understood it instantly under the Bodhi tree. It's not that difficult. Do you want to learn? I'll tell you.
...You don’t understand?
Stay calm, I will continue and you listen.
Buddha’s inner thoughts: … Damn, I’ve explained it so clearly, yet you still don’t understand?
The Buddhist system is a system that relies heavily on talent. Su Qing doesn't think that he has no talent, but the Buddhist system requires not only talent but also accumulation and hard work.
The so-called type that relies heavily on talent is actually a helpless move. Shakyamuni came to the box garden too late. The earlier one comes to the box garden, the easier it is to get a large amount of merit. Those who come late will suffer.
In particular, the concept of Buddhism is to save people. The method of becoming a three-digit number that Sakyamuni came up with has become a method that does not require much merit but requires extreme talent.
Either you don’t even understand the method to become a three-digit number, or you understand it but don’t think you understand it. Basically, with a little follow-up attempts and accumulation, you will be able to become a three-digit number.
Su Qing is more inclined to Lao Tzu's way of constructing a worldview.
Road to Road, very Avenue.
——Do you think what you think is what you think?
This is also a completely different method from the conventional way of constructing a worldview.
It is common sense that there is a very tight causal logic in the real world, and the rules are seamless and correspond one to one.
The worldview of other groups of gods is to look for those places where errors are easy to occur.
For example, Brahma’s dream, the fate of Northern Europe, and the different causes and same effects of Buddhism make it impossible for the real cause-and-effect logic to correspond one-to-one with each element in the worldview, but only to the whole.
This whole that is rejected by the real world becomes a worldview that is opposed to the real world.
In fact, these ancient worldviews were not initially looking for places where errors were easy to occur. Rather, the more mysterious the place, the more likely the gods would be interested in it, and the more likely they were to be the weak points of the real world.
In Buddhism, different causes and same results essentially mean that the person involved is pursuing his own ideals and the pursuer, and then suddenly the chain of cause and effect with reality is broken... The original purpose was just to save all living beings, so that people can reach the paradise no matter what world they live in.
The Taoist worldview was also originally intended not to construct a worldview but to analyze the world.
Later generations built their worldviews based on what is knowable and on a clear understanding of the boundaries of the world’s causal logic.
But Taoism was not originally about constructing a worldview, but about understanding the world.
The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.
For example, where the causal logic is fragile, is light a wave or a particle? Some people have proposed the wave-particle duality, but if someone insists on being obsessed with whether light is a wave or a particle, then the strict causal chain cannot be penetrated.
The original Taoists didn't care about those things.
Do you think that what you believe to be true is true?
I think none of them are essential.
The truth that can be expressed in words is not the real truth. The power that governs the laws of all phenomena in the universe is not Tao, but a Tao that is given a name... If we force ourselves to define it, we would call it "Tao", but this is not the real name of that power.
Then, Taoists took "Tao" as the core of their concept and used it as a basis to continue exploring the world.
Tao is the core of the Taoist worldview.
But what is Tao?
If you ask a Taoist, he will tell you... I don’t know.
No one was sure what it was.
What humans see is never the reality of an object, but the sunlight reflected by the object. But if there is no visual observation, what can humans use to observe?
Those who seek the Tao seek the Tao, but everything they obtain in the process of seeking the Tao is not the Tao itself.
Even those who seek the truth do not know what they are seeking. The moment they know, they have already obtained it.
The seeker of the Tao simply forcibly names a certain 'x' that he understands but does not fully understand, and knows but does not fully understand, as 'Tao'.
But Tao is not the original name of that thing.
If we look at the heavens and myriad worlds, perhaps the Three Pure Ones are the incarnation of Tao, but this is definitely not the case in the box garden. The Taoism in the box garden is a similar product. The Taoism in the box garden is all on the path of seeking.
Over time, the Taoist worldview was formed.
If you ask other pantheons about the core concepts and logic of their worldview, they can talk to you for years if they don't care about revealing the secrets of their pantheon.
If you ask about Taoism, what is the core concept and logic of their worldview, the Taoist masters can talk to you for years, but if you ask carefully, what exactly is the "Tao"...
The Taoist masters will tell you that they don’t know. The theories they have been using for several years are all indirect and sideways, describing the surface phenomena of Taoism from the perspective of their understanding and that you can understand.
Inner layer? Essence? Core?
You ask me, who should I ask?
I'm begging you, don't bother me, maybe you'll understand when I get to the first digit!
There's no hope for double digits anyway.
Taoism... To be more precise, the Taoist worldview is developed bit by bit in this way.
The Taoist worldview is an expansion of Taoism, and has developed into many branches, each of which has generated its own ideas.
But the core of the Taoist worldview is 'I don't know what Tao is'.
If you say the sky is blue, then it is blue? If you say one plus one equals two, then it equals two?
Going deeper into the microscopic world and switching to other languages or other modern systems, can you guarantee the authenticity of this thing?
There are fifty great ways, forty-nine are evolved by nature, and one is missing.
Different worldviews have different understandings. In the ancient times, it was a ray of primordial purple air that disappeared, but in the box garden, this so-called escape was not something else.
——It is the Taoist worldview, which has no clear core.
The world doesn’t know what it is, and Taoism itself doesn’t know what it is.
When other people's worldviews have a clear structure, your system, whose core no one knows, is also recognized as a worldview - because it is indeed completely different from the real world.
Chapter 104
For newcomers on the path of worldview, Taoism’s worldview is definitely a more friendly type.
The strength of Buddhism's worldview lies in the fact that as long as you can understand the method, you can create a worldview that is easily recognized by the sandbox.
The threshold is high but the effect is good. It is difficult to get started, but you will definitely get results after getting started.
The strength of Taoism's worldview lies in its low threshold. Its core is that it believes that the world one knows is not real, and based on this, one comprehends the world step by step and moves towards the direction of reality.
To some extent, this can also be called cultivation.
Getting started is very simple, and it can even be said that there is almost no threshold, but reaching the step of 'worldview' is a little more difficult. From the very beginning, this method is not aimed at staggering causal logic and then constructing a worldview.
Su Qing chose to learn from Taoism.
Firstly, each world is different from the other world. Taoist theories are recognized in the small garden. That is the so-called world view... This boundary is below two digits in the small garden, but no one knows what it is in the other world.
It may be so absurdly high that the world does not allow the existence of the so-called worldview; or it may be so terribly low that one can create a worldview with one's hands without using a four-digit energy level.
By borrowing the path of Taoism, no matter whether the divine power in Su Qing's hands can construct a stable worldview in the end, at least the process is a deeper analysis of the truth of the world - barely a consolation prize,
However, Su Qing felt that it should not be that difficult. The gods were in the wrong world on earth... at least they were listed in name in the core of the heaven, but the 'eternity' of the gods was just that in Su Qing's opinion.
There is often no direct connection between the strong and the world. Whether it is a low-level warrior who can destroy a street with one blow, or a high-level warrior who can destroy a star with one blow, if there is a sun or a black hole in the world, how can the strong have the face to use himself to represent the level of the world?
The level of civilization and the level of strength have nothing to do with the world in 99% of cases.
However, those with authority in the world represent the level of the world to a certain extent. The strong ones who can resurrect themselves are just strong ones, but the gods who can be resurrected by the core of heaven can represent the world to a certain extent, at least represent the level of heaven.
At least it represents that within the world rules, the level of gods alone can bear a certain degree of world authority.
Because of the existence of the gods, Su Qing felt that it would not be too difficult for him to construct his worldview.
Secondly, Su Qing has his own advantages.
The core of the Taoist worldview is the internal blank space, which means that those who seek the Tao feel that the Tao they have comprehended is not the true Tao.
Su Qing only intends to learn from Taoist methods, but when it comes to leaving blank space, Su Qing has his own advantage - his talent.
The gift of being able to travel through the world is difficult to define for the world itself.
To a certain extent, this is similar to the Taoist definition of Tao.
Taoists feel that I don’t know what the truth of the truth that dominates everything is, so I just call it Tao.
In the eyes of the world, the world also does not know the essence of Su Qing's ability. The phenomenon of being able to travel through the world is just the external manifestation of his ability.