Page 346
Human history can give birth to the final test of mankind, and it has the ability to break with the box garden, but if it really breaks, the cost to human history will be high.
After the final trial of humanity's spiritual power expands to its limit, a decadent trend will emerge, completely destroying the box garden - it's not that the box garden must have a mechanism to destroy itself, but because the box garden has this self-destructive mechanism, human history will more easily agree to the end of the box garden.
If human history no longer plays with the sandbox, the sandbox will inevitably be destroyed, but human history will not be much better. Without the containment of the sandbox, civilization may develop into all kinds of strange patterns.
To put it in a positive way, it is called letting a hundred flowers bloom; to put it in a negative way, it is called seeking one's own death.
With the existence of the sandbox, humans will not perish due to factors such as earthquakes and tsunamis, but without the containment of the sandbox, humans will have to face various crises of extinction.
In the long run, terminating cooperation with the current box garden will bring more benefits than disadvantages to human history. Human history also thinks so, which is why it gave birth to the final trial.
But in the short term, without the box garden, this generation of humans may face the impact of many disasters such as war, natural disasters, plague, etc.
You also have to consider that when the wind of decadence destroys the small garden, you will be affected.
When a feudal dynasty develops to the middle and late stages, it is more beneficial for the people to seize the opportunity to rebel against the emperor.
As the upper class begins to solidify, if the people do not resist now, they will inevitably suffer more and more oppression in the days to come.
But the people living in the present certainly do not want to rebel. They can survive being bullied, but those who rebel initially will almost certainly die.
From a macro perspective of human history, cooperation with the sandbox is more harmful than beneficial, and it gave birth to the final trial of mankind.
From a contemporary perspective, the box garden incorporates contemporary humans into the scope of human history through 'contemporary humans killing the final trial of humanity' - generally speaking, naturally no one wants to suffer.
Breaking away from the sandbox is beneficial to human history. It will bring harm to the present but benefit future generations.
Without the gods and Buddhas in the box garden to share the achievements of human history, humans will develop faster.
But the disadvantages of contemporary operations are that it will be useless no matter how beneficial it will be to future generations, and the contemporary world is naturally unwilling to do so.
If a human being unified human history, he could use various means to coordinate the operation of human history, but human history itself cannot interfere with humans.
Throughout the long history of mankind, the more mankind cooperates with the sandbox, the more energy it needs to expend, and the more dissatisfied it becomes. When this dissatisfaction accumulates to the limit, it gives birth to the final trial of mankind.
This dissatisfaction in human history stems from the macro perspective and from the accumulation on the timeline - but those who dominate the development of human history are always the people living in that era, not the people in history.
If I have to give an example, our ancestors have been bullied enough by gods and Buddhas, so they have to attribute the credit for whatever they have done to gods and Buddhas.
The resentment of these ancestors accumulated more and more until it reached a critical point, and human history began to take revenge on the box garden. Human history considers the interests of all mankind.
It’s fine if modern people don’t know anything.
Through the closing ceremony of the Little Garden, 'Humanity has conquered the final trial of humanity' was transmitted to human history - at this time, human history has not yet accepted the closing of the Little Garden, and it is impossible for human history to accept it like this.
——But whether it is accepted or not, the small garden submitted the conclusion to human history.
Now, human history needs to take today's human beings into consideration. Whether to accept the final outcome is a major event that affects all human beings.
Thus, human history began to make decisions based on the premise that "contemporary humans know the benefits of this event."
If we do not accept the conclusion, human history will revive the final trial of mankind and continue to fight to the death with the gods and Buddhas in the box garden.
Even if you are defeated countless times in the final trial, it will be useless. As long as you can be resurrected, it won’t be long before the Wind of Decadence will take action.
The price is that today's human beings will suffer and face the disasters that were once overcome by gods and Buddhas.
If we do not accept the conclusion of the sandbox, all human beings living in the present will suffer, but it will be beneficial to future generations.
Accepting the conclusion of the box garden, all mankind lives a stable life, but future generations have to continue to hand over their achievements to the gods and Buddhas.
The answer to what contemporary people will choose is obvious.
When most contemporary humans felt that the final trial of humanity was unnecessary, human history cut off support for the final trial of humanity, and immediately accepted the conclusion of the trial in which the box garden transcended.
This is not a stab in the back of human history. Human history will not interfere with human decision-making - for example, a war broke out between country A with a population of 100 million and country B with a population of only one million.
One hundred million people hope that country B will die, and one million people hope that country A will die. Human history will not actively eliminate the smaller side just because the side with one hundred million people is larger.
Each side is part of human history, and human history is only outward-looking, not inward-looking.
When contemporary people accepted the conclusion that the final trial had been transcended, human history cut off the resurrection mechanism for the final trial of mankind because that resurrection mechanism was not part of the spiritual nature of the final trial.
As long as humanity's final trial is not conquered, even if the humans in all the worlds observed by the box garden know that humanity's final trial will bring them disaster and curse the final trial in their hearts, human history will not cut off the privileges that have already begun towards the final trial.
For example, Azdahaka's Absolute Evil can obtain all knowledge related to malice in human history... This is the authority granted to Absolute Evil by human history, and it is already a part of the Absolute Evil spirit.
Even if all of humanity opposes it, human history will not prohibit absolute evil from accessing the human history database.
But the final trial can be resurrected. This resurrection mechanism is not part of the final trial spirit, but the ability of human history.
Human beings cannot be resurrected after the final trial. It is human history that helps the final trial to be resurrected - human history cannot interfere with humans, but humans can interfere with human history.
When contemporary people resist the final trial, human history no longer provides resurrection services for the final trial and the connection is severed.
This judgment mechanism of human history may be somewhat rigid and may be exploited by gods and Buddhas, but it can basically ensure that the core interests of human history are not lost.
Human history has given birth to many final trials for humanity, all of which have been overcome by gods and Buddhas. It may seem like a loss - but it is difficult for the box garden to continue advancing human history, and the conclusion is stuck at 2000 AD.
The more complex a rigid mechanism is, the more likely it is to be exploited. Even if a rigid mechanism is exploited, core interests can most likely be protected.
To be honest, C particles may have disadvantages for humans. If they are not guided correctly, it is very likely that the world will be like the world of Code Geass, where C particles form the C world and reversely influence humans through the spirit.
——But human history doesn’t matter.
Human history will not interfere with human decision-making. Even if someone enslaves all of humanity, as long as the one who enslaves all of humanity is a human, human history will not take any action.
The only thing human history interferes with is the friction between humans and non-humans.
If the C particles are not guided correctly, they may have a negative impact on humans?
This makes no sense in the context of human history.
The existence of C particles has made great contributions to human history. Do they need to be shared with gods and Buddhas?
Only then will human history pay attention.
If only a small amount is given to the gods and Buddhas, human history, combined with the changes that this sovereignty can bring to human history, will actively cooperate with the box garden and gather the C particles into the box garden.
The more merits the gods and Buddhas share, the more human history will reject this conclusion.
This is also the reason why the box garden gradually stopped expanding and only a few of the worlds have been included in the observation world recently. The box garden’s repulsion to human history is growing stronger and stronger.
If all the gods and Buddhas in the box garden gave up half of the sovereignty they had obtained, human history's rejection of the box garden would immediately decrease, and the box garden would continue to expand outward and observe more worlds - but very few gods and Buddhas would do this.
For example, you are an investor who takes advantage of a promising company just starting out and acquires a large number of shares in the company at a very low cost.
When the company develops to a certain size, if you give up part of your shares, the company can continue to expand, but your share ratio will be reduced.
Company expansion will also generate new benefits, but you need to compete with more people, and may not necessarily get them. Even if you do get them, they may not be as much as you got before. But the salaries of the company’s employees will definitely increase.
As an investor, would you give up your shares?
Most people would think, what does it have to do with me if the company employees’ salaries increase?
If C particles are not properly guided, they may have a reverse impact on humans through the mind, which is completely ignored by human history.
Human history is outward-looking, not inward-looking. It is roughly equivalent to the skin/clothing/weapons of all mankind, rather than the immune system of all mankind.
On the contrary, it is difficult for the two-digit ability of the box garden to do this. The accuracy of the two-digit world view may have reached the scope that human history can recognize, but the impact on humans...
For example, in Buddhism and Taoism, some ideas that encourage people to do good will be indirectly reflected in the benefits that the two-digit number wants to provide to human history.
What human history resists is not only those things that will affect human will, but more importantly, it resists those influences that will lead humans to become "non-human".
Be it Buddhism, Taoism, God or the devil, human history has not recognized them much.
What human history cares about most is "human" and "non-human". If one becomes an immortal, a god, or a Buddha, he is no longer a human.
It is human nature to want to become a Buddha after reading Buddhist scriptures, and to want to attain enlightenment after reading about immortal techniques.
As long as the grace provided by the two-digit number has a similar meaning, even if the perfection of the grace meets the needs of human history, human history will not accept it.
——But how easy is it to find a product that does not contain two-digit views from a two-digit worldview?
Can we find a kind of ability from Mount Lingshan, from the Pure Land, that does not contain Buddha nature and is useful to human history?
Human history has always required high levels of sophistication and perfection in its capabilities; only when the foundation is solid can the building be built high.
No matter how big a world a two-digit worldview can support with its sophistication, even if it has the scale of the universe...it is bound to be smaller than the scope of human history.
Considering one's own abilities as part of human history, even if they are in the double digits, not every one of them may be up to standard.
While meeting this high requirement, the ability must also be useful to the development of human history...
Take Sakyamuni Buddha as an example. If he wanted to pass on some information about his worldview to human history, would he have to have Buddha nature?
This is simply embarrassing.
chapter Ten
What good is there in letting most people in the sandbox misunderstand you?
Su Qing frowned slightly.
First of all, other people would think that there is another two-digit person behind him. The ones who would think so most would probably be the twin goddesses. Other gods and Buddhas might not be sure whether the two-digit person who "hides his identity and uses his own grace to replenish the box garden" is related to him or the twin goddesses, but the twin goddesses are definitely clear.
On the bright side, if Su Qing offers more favors that can earn him merit in the future, he won't even need to explain.
Two-digit number.
There is a backer out of nowhere, although this backer can only bluff people and cannot take any action.
Moreover, appearing to say "I'm not doing this for profit" is indeed a good idea. Only when you are willing to share the profits in your hands will others help you.
Canary verified this when planning the vote on the class ruler system. There is no doubt that allowing the lower class of the box garden to have the right to make decisions on the class ruler system is harmful rather than beneficial to the status of gods and Buddhas.
But Canary was calm during the preparation process.
——How could that group of gods not have some assassins? Those assassins who seemed to have nothing to do with their group of gods could definitely attack Qianyan.
In the small garden, the Thousand Eyes still has some deterrent power. When it comes to one's own affairs, there are too many ways to deal with them, such as prophecy.
But this can only find out who targeted Qianyan’s store. There is no reliable way to find out the person who gave the order.
There are many ways to disrupt the class dominance system in the process, but the preliminary preparations were smooth enough... which only means that there are far more than one or two gods and Buddhas watching.
They are all counting on sharing the credit for the convergence of the C particles. Whoever dares to take action will not offend the Thousand Eyes, but those hungry gods.
Such behavior is totally worthless to the gods and Buddhas in the box garden. They only need to restrain themselves to gain a lot of merit.